Waste for money poor 4k video recording Don't buy please buy Panasonic 991 it is good for money.go for it.

I bought this camera to replace an older Canon HD camera I picked up in 2012. I mostly do still photography with Nikon DSLR's, but I like to have a good video camera lying around to shoot with occasionally.

4K Image Quality Large lens and sensor size Manual Controls

Slow Auto focus Jitter on moving subjects

Very good Video when shooting at f2.8 in low light. I'm a pro videographer and this is my secondary camera. When using in low light do not use the zoom function! use your body to move closer to your subject, always stay at F2.8 in low light, the more you use zoom in low light the higher your f-stops...

I bought this camcorder to record videos at church, but I also am using it for videos of my grandchildren. After briefly reading the literature, it is easy and very intuitive to use. It has a great lens and the results are terrific!

In the next updates could improve the frames per second in 4k and take it to 60 fps Sound 5.1 is also necessary to be able to use when recording in 4K, could it be improved too

As a recently retired broadcast cameraman with a restricted budget, I spent 6 months trying every camera available within a ￡1500 price range, and came to realise that the Sony AX100 far outstrips its competitors.

Have a PJ430 but the picture was always grainy inside with warm house lighting. The Cowboy Church likes that environment so I Bought the FDR-AX100 Even though the ratings were a little gloomy; and, I was going to use the PJ430 for extra shots...