Not as advertised very cheap feel to it and it's main feature the camera ignore the hype nothing at all special about it average pics sent it back must do better Samsung

Samsung has been the frontrunner in the mobile phone game for a decade or so, and it has shaped the industry into what we see today. In this process, Samsung has popularized many trends – like wireless charging, infinity displays – and defied many others – like the notch.

Stunning Display; Great Battery; Appreciably fast charging; Still has a headphone jack; Wide-angle camera; Dual VoLTE and reliable connectivity

Quad cameras fail to impress; Average performance; No navigation gestures; Slow fingerprint scanner; Bloated UI

Samsung's Galaxy A-series is positioned between its affordable J-series and the flagship S-series of smartphones. This translates into phones that have better hardware and build compared to the J series of phones and a few features that have tricked down from the S-series.

Good; Looks good; Bright; vibrant screen; Good battery life

Bad; Underpowered for its price; Zoom and wide-angle cameras not useful in low light; Spammy notifications

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy A9 for the four-camera stack on the back

Attractive design; Vibrant display

Poor performance; Overpriced

Samsung's Galaxy S series is known for its camera performance, but recently the company changed its strategy, and brought a four-camera setup to its mid-range A series first instead of S series. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is the first device in the world to feature a quad-camera setup at the back.

When the presence of a dual camera in a smartphone is becoming mainstream and the concept of triple cameras is still a sapling, Samsung pushed all its limits to provide four cameras in its smartphone. With four cameras at the back, the Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 features a total of five cameras.

Sharp and Vibrant display; Substantial storage; Dependable battery life

Gimmicky Cameras; Performance not up to the mark

ImageTagInstance gallery-ea8a315d-e6b0-47b9-a7bc-17549dbc972f Review index HTMLTagInstance html-tag-0db1cdda-a26c-491f-8805-4f87c959dae5 Design | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-8e75db76-5822-4711-8e85-74db4cc284e6 Display | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-9702633b-8f14-44b2-9db7-be2c026a6ddb Interface | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-5c4d5e02-7549-4963-88d8-796c17546bdf Processor, Performance and Memory | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-bd9fb2e8-96d9-44a4-997a-72e4aacebdf6 Internet and Connectivity | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-6966f170-f025-4b29-9227-d4b40c28fa61 Camera | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-e8cafe64-504a-49db-913e-c66e55a5bc5b Sound Quality | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-3b387b59-66b2-46b1-823a-38a5abcae962 Call quality | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-8ea80176-82f0-4834-9130-3b5a5201cdd5 Battery life | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-62f054f5-bc0e-4b18-a8c5-90520e732e42 Price and Alternatives | HTMLTagInstance html-tag-92668132-be4e-40a1-873e-799a6142426f ConclusionSamsung might be the world’s number one phone maker by vol...

Good-looking AMOLED screen; Above-average battery life; Plentiful on-board storage; Dual SIM phone with a microSD card support;

Overpriced; Camera quality is SHOCKINGLY bad; Old software, no word about updates; Processor is much slower than that of rivals in the price range; No 4G connectivity in the US;

Without actually getting the chance to properly put those four lenses through their paces, it's impossible to assess the A9. It looks slick, and the substantial storage and AMOLED screen should soften the blow of paying £549 for a mid-range processor. Still, this phone is all about the camera, and right now we don't know if those extra lenses are the next step forward or a goofy gimmick.