Only had it a few weeks, it has done what everything Garmin said it would do, so far.

Great functions and battery life. Able to navigate easily . Good ergonomic functions.

Great watch that has everything you need. Very light weight and looks good.

Garmin has announced Venu, a new GPS smartwatch with an AMOLED screen and battery life of up to 6 days. One of many new wearables launched by Garmin at IFA in Berlin, the Venu boasts a wide range of 24/7 health monitoring features.

With GPS, cool health features—and an awesome display—the Garmin Venu is a good fitness-focused smartwatch for most people. This Garmin Venu has shown that it's the best-looking smartwatch for people who are obsessive about their health.

Accurate GPS, Onboard music storage, Good battery life, Sleep monitoring

Manual water tracking, Not as many smartwatch features as Apple Watch

Garmin’s first-ever GPS AMOLED smartwatch, the Garmin Venu, is now reduced to £200 – as cheap as it was over Black Friday

The line between a smartwatch and a fitness watch continues to dissolve on a day-by-day basis. It used to be that if you were interested in fitness you’d get a dedicated, nondescript fitness tracker with a super basic dot-matrix display (I’m looking at you, Nike FuelBand). Then Apple came out with their watch, and I remember thinking how silly it sounded. I mean, I already had a smartphone — wasn’t a smartwatch a little redundant? Oh how the times change, and there’s no better example of watch evolution than the Venu from Garmin. The Venu is basically the same thing as the Vivoactive 4 — a multisport smartwatch that still has all the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections necessary for Android and Apple notifications. However, the Venu has a key difference in its display. The Venu’s 390 x 390 pixel AMOLED display blows the Vivoactive’s 260 x 260 MIP display out of the water. While their physical sizes are similar at 1.2 inches and 1.3 inches respectively, the Venu’s screen has a far crisper p...

AMOLED Display; Activity Tracking; Workout Animations; Loads of Sensors;

Lack of in-depth fitness metrics; Lack of storage;